Sale!

Plymouth Cutter, Erycina, 1882

Original price was: £30.00.Current price is: £20.00.

Ericyna:

Plymouth Cutter;
Built as a cutter 1882; Converted to ketch rig: 1894;
Built: by W.H. Shilston at Coxside, Sutton Harbour, Plymouth, UK;
46 tons; Leingth: 74 ft (23 M) Beam: 18 ft (5 M);

Published 1968 © Hugh Evelyn; artist John Gardner (1930-2010).
c. 43 x 35 cm. (17″ x 14″) on high white matt cardstock 133 g/sm².
Shown here is a scan of the print.
This is a LARGE print; see mail costs at Shipping & Returns.

Ship detail below

In stock

  • Disc Satisfaction Guaranteed
  • Disc No Hassle Refunds (see Shipping and returns)
  • Disc Secure Payments
GUARANTEED SAFE CHECKOUT
  • Stripe
  • Visa Card
  • MasterCard
  • American Express
  • Discover Card
  • PayPal
  • Apple Pay

Description

Brixham vessels were used throughout the South. Erycina, a large cutter, was launched in 1882. Large sail area, long bow and mast stepped well aft characterised many Devon vessels. Built for speed and big Atlantic seas her heavy scantlings were typical of the period. 2 ½ in yellow pine planks fastened to doubled 3 x 3 ½ inch oak frames by treenails, or oak pegs, split and caulked. 30 tons of pig iron ballast (kentledge), stowed in the bilges. Cutter rigged with a large loose-footed mainsail, topsail, foresail and jib set flying on the bow­sprit. A big tow foresail on the forestay. In light air or fishing for hake, to keep nets clear of the bottom, a couple of square sails were set on the weather side. Some trawlers fitted reef points on their sails. Erycina, in common with most, had lacing eyes. Taking in a reef was a big job; a man stood in the belly of the sail, often full of water, to pass 10 fathoms of 1 ½ in rope through each eyelet under the foot of the sail, working aft to forward. A 40-ft bowsprit projected 28 ft outboard of the stem – a running spar hauled inboard in harbour or under reduced sail. A 50 ft boom in a light oily swell where the vessel tended to roll, this great spar swinging about was a danger and put severe strain on the rigging. The low freeboard is not apparent from the illustration because of the high bulwarks which disguise the fact that the hull is two-and-a-half times larger under water. The heavily-ballasted hull made for good carrying ability. The low freeboard gave a convenient platform to handle the nets. With little reserve buoyancy or lift for a hull of such displacement, in heavy weather, especially when working to windward, her decks were liable to be well washed down.

Additional information

Dimensions 44.5 × 35.5 cm